NISM Series XIX-A · Chapter 8
Fund Due Diligence – Investor Perspective
This original lesson is awaiting subject-matter review. If something looks wrong, tell us through the contact page.
This is the most important chapter in the exam (about 15 marks). Because investors commit to a "blind pool" for many years, the decision rests on judging the manager: the team, its track record, strategy, investment process, terms and operations. This chapter explains what investors (and distributors helping them) should examine, how to read a track record, and the red flags to watch for.
1Why fund due diligence matters
- In a close-ended AIF, the investor cannot exit easily, and the investments are not yet known. Choosing the right manager is the main decision.
- Returns differ widely between top and bottom managers, so manager selection adds or loses far more value than in listed markets.
- Due diligence covers investment aspects (team, track record, strategy, process) and operational aspects (governance, valuation, compliance, systems).
- Investors use the PPM, a due diligence questionnaire (DDQ), meetings with the team, data on past funds, and reference calls.
2The team
- Experience and skills relevant to the strategy: sourcing, investing, value creation, exits.
- Stability and cohesion: how long the team has worked together; turnover of senior people.
- Attribution: which individuals actually led the successful deals in the track record, and are they still here?
- Alignment: the team's own investment in the fund and how carried interest is shared within the team.
- Succession and key person arrangements.
Remember
- People first: experience, stability, attribution, alignment, succession.
3The track record
- Look at net returns (after fees and carry): IRR, TVPI and DPI for each past fund.
- Compare with peers of the same vintage and strategy, using quartile rankings (top quartile = best 25%).
- Separate realised (exited) from unrealised (still held, valued by the manager) results. A track record that is mostly unrealised is less reliable.
- Check dispersion within the portfolio: were returns driven by one lucky deal or by consistent results?
- Check persistence: has the manager done well across several funds and market cycles?
- Ask whether past results are relevant to the new fund (same team, strategy and fund size).
Example Manager A's last fund shows a 3.0x TVPI, but its DPI is 0.4x and one company makes up 60% of the value. The headline number depends on one unrealised holding: a red flag to examine closely.
Remember
- Net, realised, peer-compared, consistent, relevant.
4Strategy and investment process
- Edge: why can this manager find, win and improve deals better than others (sector expertise, networks, operating skills)?
- Fit with the market: is there enough opportunity for the strategy and fund size?
- Fund size: a much larger fund than before may push the manager into bigger deals outside its proven skill (strategy drift).
- Process: how deals are sourced, screened, approved (investment committee), monitored and exited, and how risk is controlled.
- Portfolio construction: number of holdings, concentration limits, reserves for follow-on investments.
5Terms and alignment
- Fees and carry: management fee level and basis; hurdle; carry percentage; catch-up; waterfall (whole-fund versus deal-by-deal); clawback.
- Manager commitment ("skin in the game").
- Key person, no-fault removal and for-cause removal clauses.
- Other fees: transaction or monitoring fees charged to portfolio companies, and whether they are offset against the management fee.
- Expenses charged to the fund, and their caps.
6Operational due diligence
Many fund problems come from operations, not from investments. Check:
- governance: trustee, investment committee, compliance officer, conflict of interest policy;
- valuation policy and use of an independent valuer;
- service providers: custodian, fund accountant, auditor, legal advisers;
- reporting quality and timeliness;
- regulatory history: SEBI registration, past actions, PPM audit findings;
- controls over cash movements, cyber security and record keeping;
- related-party transactions and how they are disclosed.
7Red flags
- High turnover of senior team members, or disputes in the team.
- Track record mostly unrealised, or driven by one deal.
- Strategy drift or a big jump in fund size.
- Unusually high fees, or fees that are not clearly disclosed.
- Weak governance, unclear valuation policy, or no independent valuer.
- Undisclosed related-party deals or conflicts.
- Reluctance to share information or allow reference calls.
- Pressure to commit quickly, or promises of returns.
8The distributor's role
A distributor helping an investor choose an AIF should:
- first check suitability: the investor's wealth, liquidity, time horizon, risk appetite and experience;
- explain the strategy, risks, fees, lock-in and drawdown obligations honestly, using the PPM;
- not overstate past performance or promise returns;
- disclose the distribution fee and the availability of the direct plan;
- document the advice and the investor's understanding.
Remember
- Suitability first; explain risks, fees and lock-in; disclose commission and the direct plan.
Original summary written by Integrato Digital to complement the official NISM workbook (March 2026 version). Read the workbook for the full text.